home  |  book  |

Is It Bush We Are Testing to Destruction? Speak Progressive, But Win Conservative Reform

print view

The Democrats' Drive-by Politics for 2006

by Christopher Chantrill
June 18, 2006 at 8:42 pm

|

WHAT A SURPRISE. The Democrats’ New Direction for America (pdf), their blueprint for capturing control of Congress this Fall turns out not to be the call to arms, the Democratic Contract with America we were promised, but a bland reassurance to their base. It is not a message to the supposed base of Angry Lefties, but the real base of pensioned, protected, tenured, dependent beneficiaries.

We’ll make health care more affordable, Democrats promise, by cracking down on Big Drug. We’ll “crack down on price gouging,” they declare, by cracking down on Big Oil. We’ll Help Working Families, Cut College Costs, and Ensure Dignified Retirement.

This is drive-by politics, spraying the political neighborhood with bullets and hoping that one of them hits home.

But there is nothing in these headline issues about Iraq. There is nothing about immigration. There is nothing about the environment or global warming. There is nothing about social issues. We know why. Democrats are split, or they disagree with most Americans on those issues. So it is better for them to say nothing.

Democrats aren’t going to play big ball this fall after all. They are going to stay with small ball. For some reason that surprises us. But it shouldn’t. Modern Democrats shrink from risk, opting for safety, for they are the party of the great special interests that are afraid of change. But why the drive-by manifesto?

We should never forget that there are three world-historical movements competing against each other in the world today. There is Civilization, the culture of commerce and law in the city begun in Mesopotamia some 5,000 years ago. There is Progressive Puritanism, libertine in sex but rigidly controlling in everything else, a recurring conceit of well-born adolescents. And now there is Muslim Reaction, a movement that needs no introduction. There is also the culture of lefty thug dictators, a sordid sideshow beneath our contempt.

In the culture of Civilization—which means, let us never forget, citification—city, commerce, and law come together like ham and eggs and hash browns. The greatness of the city is founded on a simple fact. It does not grow its own food, so it must trade for it. Thus it must foster commerce, and as soon as commerce emerges there is a need for law, for businessmen need an efficient way of adjudicating their mistakes and their disputes without destroying the bottom line. The aftertaste of this happy meal is prosperity and wealth, every time it is tried.

Progressive Puritanism is a horse of a different color. It emerged just after the beginning of the industrial age. At the moment that the businessmen of the era were succeeding in a risky scheme of transforming the hungry peasants of Europe and the immigrants to North America into productive industrial wage-earners the sons of the middle class decided that the effort had completely failed. How right they were. Look at what happened.

The Steam and Steel era of the nineteenth century merely gave every working man cash wages and food on the table. The Auto and Electric era of the twentieth century merely put a car in every garage and offered suburban comfort to every woman (not to mention safe childbirth). And now the Information era of the twenty-first century merely puts a computer on every desk. With genuine democracy, imagine how much higher we might have soared!

Progressive Puritanism has always been a drive-by politics of well-born adolescents appalled that the world did not measure up to their high ideals.

So it makes complete sense that Democrats would come out with a drive-by manifesto that blames high drug prices for seniors on Big Drug, and not on the bramble of government drug regulation.

It’s obvious that they would blame high gasoline prices on “price gouging” by Big Oil and not on the environmentalists who for thirty years blocked any kind of energy development that did not require enormous subsidy. Any well-born adolescent majoring in environmental science would agree with that.

The chance of Dignified Retirement is mostly at risk from a pay-as-you-go government Ponzi scheme, but Democrats oppose letting Big Finance take over America’s retirement system and setting it to rights.

To Cut College Costs Democrats want to increase subsidies to help parents and students feed the beast rather than attack the monopolistic practices, the tenure, the subsidies, the waste of Big Education.

To Help Working Families, Democrats will crack down on the stingy wages and subsidies of Big Business. Never mind how the web of Big Government regulation attempts to reduce young business saplings into twisted bonsai trees instead of straight, true trees that reach for the sky.

It’s all baloney, but hey, in drive-by politics you never know when one of your wild accusations will hit home with the voters.

Christopher Chantrill blogs at americanmanifestobook.blogspot.com.

Buy his Road to the Middle Class.

print view

To comment on this article at American Thinker click here.

To email the author, click here.

 

 TAGS

Chappies

“But I saw a man yesterday who knows a fellow who had it from a chappie that said that Urquhart had been dipping himself a bit recklessly off the deep end.”  —Freddy Arbuthnot
Dorothy L. Sayers, Strong Poison

Hugo on Genius

“Tear down theory, poetic systems... No more rules, no more models... Genius conjures up rather than learns... ” —Victor Hugo
César Graña, Bohemian versus Bourgeois

Education

“We have met with families in which for weeks together, not an article of sustenance but potatoes had been used; yet for every child the hard-earned sum was provided to send them to school.”
E. G. West, Education and the State

Faith & Purpose

“When we began first to preach these things, the people appeared as awakened from the sleep of ages—they seemed to see for the first time that they were responsible beings...”
Finke, Stark, The Churching of America, 1776-1990

Conversion

“When we received Christ,” Phil added, “all of a sudden we now had a rule book to go by, and when we had problems the preacher was right there to give us the answers.”
James M. Ault, Jr., Spirit and Flesh

Postmodernism

A writer who says that there are no truths, or that all truth is ’merely relative’, is asking you not to believe him. So don’t.
Roger Scruton, Modern Philosophy

Faith and Politics

As far as the Catholic Church is concerned, the principal focus of her interventions in the public arena is the protection and promotion of the dignity of the person, and she is thereby consciously drawing particular attention to principles which are not negotiable... [1.] protection of life in all its stages, from the first moment of conception until natural death; [2.] recognition and promotion of the natural structure of the family... [3.] the protection of the right of parents to educate their children.
Pope Benedict XVI, Speech to European Peoples Party, 2006

China and Christianity

At first, we thought [the power of the West] was because you had more powerful guns than we had. Then we thought it was because you had the best political system. Next we focused on your economic system. But in the past twenty years, we have realized that the heart of your culture is your religion: Christianity.
David Aikman, Jesus in Beijing

Religion, Property, and Family

But the only religions that have survived are those which support property and the family. Thus the outlook for communism, which is both anti-property and anti-family, (and also anti-religion), is not promising.
F.A. Hayek, The Fatal Conceit

Conservatism

Conservatism is the philosophy of society. Its ethic is fraternity and its characteristic is authority — the non-coercive social persuasion which operates in a family or a community. It says ‘we should...’.
Danny Kruger, On Fraternity

US Life in 1842

Families helped each other putting up homes and barns. Together, they built churches, schools, and common civic buildings. They collaborated to build roads and bridges. They took pride in being free persons, independent, and self-reliant; but the texture of their lives was cooperative and fraternal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism

Society and State

For [the left] there is only the state and the individual, nothing in between. No family to rely on, no friend to depend on, no community to call on. No neighbourhood to grow in, no faith to share in, no charities to work in. No-one but the Minister, nowhere but Whitehall, no such thing as society - just them, and their laws, and their rules, and their arrogance.
David Cameron, Conference Speech 2008

presented by Christopher Chantrill

 •  Contact