home  |  book  |

Storm Signals Mean Political Change Ahead It's Not The Dependency Ratio, Stupid

print view

What Gas-Guzzling Dinosaur?

by Christopher Chantrill
August 23, 2006 at 10:51 pm

|

THE CAR GUYS don’t appreciate New York Times foreign policy columnist Thomas Friedman setting up as an expert on the auto industry. He allowed as how he thought Toyota should take over the bankrupt General Motors. It would be in America’s economic interest and its geopolitical interest.

You see, writes Friedman, General Motors “based its business strategy on building gas-guzzling cars” whereas Toyota “has pioneered the very hybrid engine technology that can help rescue not only our economy from its oil addiction (how about 500 miles per gallon of gasoline?), but also our foreign policy from dependence on Middle Eastern oil autocrats.”

The reaction of Detroit News editorial cartoonist Henry Payne reminds me of an earnest young man in a shop selling fine whiskies in Edinburgh, Scotland. Asked what he thought of a journalist’s recent book on malt whisky, he allowed as how “the man’s a buffoon; he knows nothing about whisky.”

Let’s see. According to edmunds.com GM’s 2007 mid-size Chevrolet Malibu weighs in at about 3,300 pounds with a base 2.2 liter gasoline engine rated at 144 horsepower and 24/32 miles per gallon. Toyota’s 2007 Camry weighs in at about 3,300 pounds with a base 2.4 liter gasoline engine rated at 158 horsepower and 24/33 miles per gallon. Who is the gas-guzzler here?

What about the real thing: evil gas-guzzling SUVs? The Chevrolet Tahoe weighs about 5,500 lb., with a 5.3 liter engine delivering 320 hp. and 15/21 mpg. The Toyota Land Cruiser weighs about 5,400 lb, with a 4.7 liter engine delivering 275 hp. and 13/17 mpg.

To think that back in 1983 the Toyota Camry debuted at a lean 2,400 lbs with a 2.0 liter engine generating 95 hp.

Now about that 500 miles per gallon that Tom is talking about. He means, of course, the net use of gasoline in a “plug-in hybrid,” a car that you plug in every night to charge off the electric grid. Next day you drive around mostly without kicking in the gasoline engine. That way you can put up a bumper sticker on your modified Prius boasting “500 MPG”—right next to the fraying “ReDefeat Bush” sticker.

But when everyone is charging their cars off the nation’s electric grid then we are going to have to build more generating plants, a lot more. Are we talking coal plants (33 percent efficient), nuclear plants, natural gas combined-cycle plants (up to 60 percent efficient), or subsidized wind power here? And are liberals really going to cooperate as we pave the nation over with new power plants and cover the viewscapes of rich liberals with wind farms?

Don’t get me wrong. I think that Toyota is a corporate miracle and its Hybrid Synergy Drive the coolest thing imaginable. It’s just that, from the perspective of saving the planet, energy is energy. If we don’t power our SUVs with gasoline, we’ll power them with something else.

What really upsets me is the gall of some liberal pundit saying yeah, let’s have brilliant Toyota take over lazy gas-guzzling GM. Mosts of GM’s problems were made in America by liberals. It was liberals, remember, who wrote laws to exempt labor unions from the common law’s ancient prohibition against combinations in restraint of trade. The consequence was that Big Steel and Big Auto were intimidated into promising most of their future profits to their unionized employees and retirees.

It was liberals who insisted that we change the rules on Big Auto in the 1970s and mandate higher gas mileage for cars. Don’t tell me that they didn’t know that the rules would benefit Toyota, manufacturer—in those innocent times—of small fuel-efficient cars. But Big Auto had the last laugh. It learned how to sell monster vans and trucks to American women. How did they do it? They sold the soccer moms on safety. It took a while, but today Toyota and Honda sell mini-vans and SUVs that concede nothing to GM and Ford in the size and weight department.

Like every liberal fashionable, Tom Friedman this week thinks that hybrid is the future. Maybe it is. Or maybe the hydrogen-powered fuel cell is the future, or plug-in hybrid, or solar cells in space. Maybe nuclear is the future, or biomass, or wind power. It’s a free country.

The political class is like everyone else. It much prefers meddling in the technology business to doing the government’s business. And why not? Tom Friedman’s day job is thinking deep thoughts about the mess in Iraq and the quagmire in southern Lebanon. Telling Toyota how to fix General Motors sounds like much more fun.

Christopher Chantrill blogs at americanmanifestobook.blogspot.com.

Buy his Road to the Middle Class.

print view

To comment on this article at American Thinker click here.

To email the author, click here.

 

 TAGS

Chappies

“But I saw a man yesterday who knows a fellow who had it from a chappie that said that Urquhart had been dipping himself a bit recklessly off the deep end.”  —Freddy Arbuthnot
Dorothy L. Sayers, Strong Poison

Hugo on Genius

“Tear down theory, poetic systems... No more rules, no more models... Genius conjures up rather than learns... ” —Victor Hugo
César Graña, Bohemian versus Bourgeois

Education

“We have met with families in which for weeks together, not an article of sustenance but potatoes had been used; yet for every child the hard-earned sum was provided to send them to school.”
E. G. West, Education and the State

Faith & Purpose

“When we began first to preach these things, the people appeared as awakened from the sleep of ages—they seemed to see for the first time that they were responsible beings...”
Finke, Stark, The Churching of America, 1776-1990

Conversion

“When we received Christ,” Phil added, “all of a sudden we now had a rule book to go by, and when we had problems the preacher was right there to give us the answers.”
James M. Ault, Jr., Spirit and Flesh

Postmodernism

A writer who says that there are no truths, or that all truth is ’merely relative’, is asking you not to believe him. So don’t.
Roger Scruton, Modern Philosophy

Faith and Politics

As far as the Catholic Church is concerned, the principal focus of her interventions in the public arena is the protection and promotion of the dignity of the person, and she is thereby consciously drawing particular attention to principles which are not negotiable... [1.] protection of life in all its stages, from the first moment of conception until natural death; [2.] recognition and promotion of the natural structure of the family... [3.] the protection of the right of parents to educate their children.
Pope Benedict XVI, Speech to European Peoples Party, 2006

China and Christianity

At first, we thought [the power of the West] was because you had more powerful guns than we had. Then we thought it was because you had the best political system. Next we focused on your economic system. But in the past twenty years, we have realized that the heart of your culture is your religion: Christianity.
David Aikman, Jesus in Beijing

Religion, Property, and Family

But the only religions that have survived are those which support property and the family. Thus the outlook for communism, which is both anti-property and anti-family, (and also anti-religion), is not promising.
F.A. Hayek, The Fatal Conceit

Conservatism

Conservatism is the philosophy of society. Its ethic is fraternity and its characteristic is authority — the non-coercive social persuasion which operates in a family or a community. It says ‘we should...’.
Danny Kruger, On Fraternity

US Life in 1842

Families helped each other putting up homes and barns. Together, they built churches, schools, and common civic buildings. They collaborated to build roads and bridges. They took pride in being free persons, independent, and self-reliant; but the texture of their lives was cooperative and fraternal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism

Society and State

For [the left] there is only the state and the individual, nothing in between. No family to rely on, no friend to depend on, no community to call on. No neighbourhood to grow in, no faith to share in, no charities to work in. No-one but the Minister, nowhere but Whitehall, no such thing as society - just them, and their laws, and their rules, and their arrogance.
David Cameron, Conference Speech 2008

presented by Christopher Chantrill

 •  Contact