home  |  book  |

I Double Dare You! To Dare to Do It

print view

Why Americans Are Anti-Intellectual

by Christopher Chantrill
December 12, 2004 at 3:00 am

|

“WHY IS the US so anti-intellectual?” asked a Kerry-voting friend a month after the recent presidential election.  “Don’t answer right now, but I’d like to hear your response.”

It’s right for Kerry supporters to be asking a question or two now that they are emerging from denial.  They might learn something.  They might learn why the American people just aren’t too enamored of America’s educated, intellectual elite these days.  But why should this be?  Why should Americans reject the people who have done so much for them, bringing them public schools, women’s suffrage, labor laws, Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, environmental protection, civil rights for blacks, women, gays, consumers, and support for the traditionally marginalized? 

The answer is that the experience of living under the rule of America’s enlightened elite has not been quite the bed of roses that liberal Whig history likes to portray.  The governance of America’s intellectual elite has been good for the elite, that is for sure.  But it has not always been good for the rest of us.  Let us take a look at a few examples.

The jewel in the crown of intellectual America is supposed to be the common school system that was enacted in the 1840s.  Yet before Horace Mann had returned glowing from his tour of Prussian schools Americans were already about 90 percent literate.  Almost everyone got at least 3-4 years of schooling in the mixture of academies, urban schools, and rural “old-field” schools that flourished in the early nineteenth century.  In those days parents could select the school of their choice.  Today, after a century and a half of schooling directed by the intellectual elite, average parents have little or no choice in schooling for their children.  And about 30 percent of Americans have trouble reading a bus schedule.  Should they be grateful for this?

About 70 years ago the intellectual elite grandly presented the American people with Social Security, a pay-as-you-go system in which beneficiaries have no property rights.  But college professors, teachers, and many government employees enjoy fully funded retirement programs that are legally the property of the beneficiaries.  Should the American people be grateful for this?

Let’s talk about crime.  The intellectual elite told us that crime was a result of “root causes” such as poverty and lack of education.  We shouldn’t blame the underprivileged youth that committed the crimes and just lock them up, for incarceration only dealt with symptoms.  Only a program that attacked the root causes could reduce crime.  In England, of course, they went a step further and actually convicted householders of the crime of resisting burglars.  It has made householders “confused” and burglars “confident” according to the London Daily Telegraph.  In New York, in the teeth of opposition from the intellectual class, Mayor Rudolph Giuliani and Police Commissioner Bratton tried the “broken window” policy proposed by neoconservative thinkers.  They arrested young punks for public drinking, loitering, and turnstile-jumping.  And crime rates went down.  Today in New York, criminals feel “confused” and upright citizens feel “confident” about crime.  And the dirty little secret is that 6 percent of men commit over 50 percent of crimes.  Lock up the 6 percent, and the crime rate will plummet.  Should the American people elect the candidate of the intellectual elite to power after the success of this little social experiment?

Then there’s the family.  To free women from servitude to unwanted children and unhappy marriages, our intellectual elites have championed unrestricted abortion and no-fault divorce.  They wanted women to have the right to live public lives and enjoy fulfilling creative careers just like men.  Today American children yearn for the brothers and sisters they will never have, and they live in terror of their parents splitting up.  But is the “creativity” of fulfilling work really a greater good than the act of creation and raising a family?  Many Americans don’t think so.  As David Brooks has written, many natalists and Patio-men have fled the cities and their elite mores for the ex-urbs where they can have big families and get them out of the nest before the intellectual elite notices.  Should they be grateful that they had to hide in the boondocks to have the right to create the environment they wanted for their children?

Nobody doubts that our intellectual elites are highly evolved, profoundly tolerant of diversity, and environmentally sensitive.  Understandably, they have used their cultural and political power to bring their concerns to the fore, concerns that are good and noble.  But other Americans are not particularly attracted to their lofty goals.  Most Americans are fully challenged by keeping a job, finding a home in a nice safe neighborhood, paying the mortgage, and finding a good school for the kids.  That’s why they once voted for an “amiable dunce” and now for President Moron.

Christopher Chantrill blogs at americanmanifestobook.blogspot.com.

Buy his Road to the Middle Class.

print view

To comment on this article at American Thinker click here.

To email the author, click here.

 

 TAGS


Action

The incentive that impels a man to act is always some uneasiness... But to make a man act [he must have] the expectation that purposeful behavior has the power to remove or at least to alleviate the felt uneasiness.
Ludwig von Mises, Human Action


Chappies

“But I saw a man yesterday who knows a fellow who had it from a chappie that said that Urquhart had been dipping himself a bit recklessly off the deep end.”  —Freddy Arbuthnot
Dorothy L. Sayers, Strong Poison


China and Christianity

At first, we thought [the power of the West] was because you had more powerful guns than we had. Then we thought it was because you had the best political system. Next we focused on your economic system. But in the past twenty years, we have realized that the heart of your culture is your religion: Christianity.
David Aikman, Jesus in Beijing


Churches

[In the] higher Christian churches... they saunter through the liturgy like Mohawks along a string of scaffolding who have long since forgotten their danger. If God were to blast such a service to bits, the congregation would be, I believe, genuinely shocked. But in the low churches you expect it every minute.
Annie Dillard, Holy the Firm


Class War

In England there were always two sharply opposed middle classes, the academic middle class and the commercial middle class. In the nineteenth century, the academic middle class won the battle for power and status... Then came the triumph of Margaret Thatcher... The academics lost their power and prestige and... have been gloomy ever since.
Freeman Dyson, “The Scientist as Rebel”


Conservatism

Conservatism is the philosophy of society. Its ethic is fraternity and its characteristic is authority — the non-coercive social persuasion which operates in a family or a community. It says ‘we should...’.
Danny Kruger, On Fraternity


Conservatism's Holy Grail

What distinguishes true Conservatism from the rest, and from the Blair project, is the belief in more personal freedom and more market freedom, along with less state intervention... The true Third Way is the Holy Grail of Tory politics today - compassion and community without compulsion.
Minette Marrin, The Daily Telegraph


Conversion

“When we received Christ,” Phil added, “all of a sudden we now had a rule book to go by, and when we had problems the preacher was right there to give us the answers.”
James M. Ault, Jr., Spirit and Flesh


Democratic Capitalism

I mean three systems in one: a predominantly market economy; a polity respectful of the rights of the individual to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; and a system of cultural institutions moved by ideals of liberty and justice for all. In short, three dynamic and converging systems functioning as one: a democratic polity, an economy based on markets and incentives, and a moral-cultural system which is plural and, in the largest sense, liberal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism


Drang nach Osten

There was nothing new about the Frankish drive to the east... [let] us recall that the continuance of their rule depended upon regular, successful, predatory warfare.
Richard Fletcher, The Barbarian Conversion


Education

“We have met with families in which for weeks together, not an article of sustenance but potatoes had been used; yet for every child the hard-earned sum was provided to send them to school.”
E. G. West, Education and the State


Faith & Purpose

“When we began first to preach these things, the people appeared as awakened from the sleep of ages—they seemed to see for the first time that they were responsible beings...”
Finke, Stark, The Churching of America, 1776-1990


presented by Christopher Chantrill

 •  Contact